|
Center Applauds Closure of Clear Creek Management Area for Public Health and Endangered Species Protection
Published on May 5, 2008 - 8:48:29 AM
By: Center for Biological Diversity
HOLLISTER, Calif. - The Bureau of Land Management closed to the public over 30,000 acres of the Clear Creak Management Area in response to a multi-year Environmental Protection Agency report that concluded that the carcinogenic asbestos stirred up by motorcycles, all-terrain vehicles, and sport utility vehicles pose a serious health risk to visitors.
"It's about time that the agency steps in to protect public health," said Chris Kassar, a biologist with the Center for Biological Diversity. "The EPA study confirms that asbestos levels and toxic dust kicked up by off-road vehicles is a much greater health hazard than previously thought, and the Bureau of Land Management is going to have to be very careful about how they manage this area in the future."
The Clear Creek Management Area, near Coalinga in San Benito and Fresno Counties, contains one of the largest naturally occurring asbestos deposits on Earth, and the land is dotted with abandoned asbestos and mercury mines. Visitors entering Clear Creek's 30,000-acre "red zone" see signs warning of asbestos exposure and are warned to avoid breathing dust and drinking water from the area.
The EPA has been reporting high levels of asbestos for years, but the recent assessment is the most conclusive reporting alarming statistics like the fact that five visits a year to the Clear Creek Management Area over three decades could lead to lung cancer and other crippling diseases.
Protecting public health isn't the only concern in the area. The Center for Biological Diversity and the California Native Plant Society filed suit in federal court in 2004 in an effort to get the Bureau of Land Management to manage off-road vehicle abuse until it acted to protect the threatened San Benito evening primrose, a wildflower found only in the Clear Creek area. About two-thirds of the area's colonies of the primrose have been harmed by off -road activity, and one colony of 1,476 plants was wiped out by off-road drivers between 2000 and 2003. As a result of this lawsuit, off-road use was officially restricted to 242 miles of trails to protect the primrose and other fragile species.
For a link to the EPA study, click here: http://www.epa.gov/region09/toxic/noa/clearcreek/

In the interest of fostering civil and issue-oriented discourse, YubaNet does not publish reader comments identified by anonymous Internet "handles" (fake user ID names like "farfromthinkin"). Your full and real name will be published with your comment. Your email address will not be shown, unless you specifically "uncheck" the box 'Hide my email.' By submitting a comment you consent to our rules.
Comments
Dustin Soldano
16 May 2008, 09:52
I feel that the offroad community has no voice in any manner, the BLM is
scared of the sue happy enviroMENTALS.
As for the asbestos hazard to the peoples who visit CCMA, I feel it is a
farce. Has anyone ever done a asbestos sample in downtown San Francisco? I
would bet that the levels would be alarming,SHUT THE CITY DOWN TOO!!!
Brian Minneker
14 May 2008, 13:24
THE DATA THAT WAS COLLECTED VIA AIR SAMPLES AT CLEAR CREEK MANAGEMENT AREA
ARE INCORRECT. JERE JOHNSON (EPA) STATED THAT THEY DIDNT UNDERSTAND THE AIR
SAMPLES WHEN THEY SHOWED RIDING OFF-ROAD ON A WET DAY WAS THE SAME "RISK"
AS RIDING ON A DRY DAY. THIS IS SOMETHING THAT THE OFF-ROAD COMMUNITY IS
GOING TO FIGHT IN COURT.
Troy Weis
10 May 2008, 00:13
It is a shame that America is no longer the land of the free.
I have enjoyed riding in this area for the last 30 years, and my Father for
the last 50 years... Three generations of riding this area and not once
have I heard of any reported case of cancer from the naturaly occuring
asbestos.
People who do not use Gods land should leave it for those who do... And I
represent an orginization that treads lightly.
|