YubaNet.com
Thursday, August 28 2014

            We Deliver News to the Sierra
News Fire News spacer Latest News spacer Regional News spacer California News spacer USA News spacer World News spacer Op-Ed spacer Enviro News spacer Sci Tech News spacer Life spacer Odd News spacer Cartoons spacer
Features The Calendar features features Weather features Sierra NightSky features features features Road Conditions features Home spacer
CA
 

Judicial Performance Commission Issues Public Admonishment of Judge Derek G. Johnson for Rape Remarks


    Google+    

By: Commission on Judicial Performance

Dec. 13, 2012 - The Commission on Judicial Performance has publicly admonished Judge Derek G. Johnson of the Orange County Superior Court.

The commission determined that Judge Johnson should be publicly admonished for remarks he made while sentencing a defendant convicted of rape and other sexual assault offenses. The comments created the impression that the judge was not impartial in cases involving rape without serious bodily injury showing resistance by the victim. The commission found that the judge's comments were contrary to canon 2A of the Code of Judicial Ethics, which requires a judge to act at all times in a manner that promotes public confidence in the integrity and impartiality of the judiciary, and canon 3B(5), which requires a judge to perform judicial duties without bias or prejudice, and provides that a judge shall not, in the performance of judicial duties, engage in speech or other conduct that would reasonably be perceived as bias or prejudice.

After stating that he would sentence the defendant to the midterm of six years, rather than 16 years as requested by the prosecutor, the judge stated: "I'm not a gynecologist, but I can tell you something: If someone doesn't want to have sexual intercourse, the body shuts down. The body will not permit that to happen unless a lot of damage is inflicted, and we heard nothing about that in this case. That tells me that the victim in this case, although she wasn't necessarily willing, she didn't put up a fight. And to treat this case like the rape cases that we all hear about is an insult to victims of rape. I think it's an insult. I think it trivializes a rape." Later the judge stated: "I found this whole case to be a technical case. The rape is technical. The forced oral copulation is technical. It's more of a crim law test than a real live criminal case."

The commission found that the judge's comments suggested the judge was not impartial towards sexual assault victims who do not "put up a fight," by suggesting that they are not victims of a "real" crime. Further, the judge improperly relied on his own "expert opinion" concerning serious bodily injury showing resistance based on his experiences in the district attorney's office, rather than evidence before him. (See Inquiry Concerning Judge Jose A. Velasquez (2007) 49 Cal.4th CJP Supp. 175, 204; Public Admonishment of Judge Christine K. Moruza (2008) p. 7.) The judge's statement that the lack of physical damage showed that the victim "didn't put up a fight," along with his comment immediately thereafter that treating the case before him like other rape cases was "an insult to victims of rape" and "trivializes rape," reflected his own view that a victim must resist in order for there to be a "real" sexual assault — a view that is inconsistent with California law, which since 1980 has contained no requirement of proof that the victim of rape either resisted or was prevented from resisting because of threats. (See Pen. Code, § 261; People v. Iniguez (1994) 7 Cal.4th 847, 854-856.) In the commission's view, the judge's remarks reflected outdated, biased and insensitive views about sexual assault victims who do not "put up a fight." Such comments cannot help but diminish public confidence and trust in the impartiality of the judiciary. In his response to the commission and at his appearance, Judge Johnson conceded his comments were inappropriate and apologized.

The decision noted that the remarks were made in June 2008 but did not come to the attention of the commission until May 2012.

Judge Johnson is represented by attorney Paul S. Meyer of Costa Mesa, California.

The public admonishment is available on the commission's website at www.cjp.ca.gov (under "Pending Cases - Press Releases & Documents" and "Public Discipline & Decisions 1961 - Present") and from the commission's office.

 

Help us bring you more news. Be a real reader: Support YubaNet

By submitting a comment you consent to our rules. You must use your real first and last name, not a nickname or alias. A comment here is just like a letter to the editor or a post on Facebook. Thank you.

 

Latest Headlines

CA

Poster of the South Napa Earthquake of 24 August 2014 - Magnitude 6.0

Nuclear watchdog petitions federal regulator to close unsafe Diablo Canyon nuclear reactors

Recovery Underway at U.S. Forest Service office in Vallejo

Feinstein: West Coast Needs Earthquake Early-Warning System

Complaint Filed with CA Dept. of Education Alleges Illegal School Funding Allocations of Over 6 Million Dollars in Kern County

Army Corps dams, projects undamaged after Napa quake

City of Napa Status Update Aug. 25

Don't dismiss a 2014 'super' El Niño just yet

Diablo Canyon: Secret document details federal safety inspector's alarm over plant's vulnerability to earthquakes


More

 

 

 

 

NEWS . Fire News . Latest . Regional . California . USA . World . Op-Ed . Enviro . Sci/Tech . Life . Odd News . Cartoons
FEATURES . The Calendar .Weather . Sierra NightSky . Horoscope . Road Conditions
YubaNet.com . Advertising. About Us . Support YubaNet . Contact Us . Terms of Use . Privacy

YubaNet.com © 1999-2014
Nevada City, California (530) 478-9600