|
Martha Rosenberg: Like Many Mass Shooters, NIU Gunman Was a Legal Gun Owner
Published on Feb 20, 2008 - 7:52:45 AM
By: Martha Rosenberg
While the nation debates NIU shooter Stephen Phillip Kazmierczak's mental health, how many realize he waltzed into Tony's Guns in Champaign, IL five days before the massacre and bought a Remington and a Glock?
Kazmierczak may have been institutionalized for a year and given a psychological discharge from the Army, but he passed the background check just fine when he bought two of his four weapons at a Champaign, IL gun store!
So did Latina Williams who shot three at Louisiana Technical College in Baton Rouge on February 8. She might have been living in her car, paranoid and delusional and giving her possessions away in suicidal gestures but she walked right into a New Orleans pawn shop and bought a .357 revolver and a box of ammunition the day before the shootings.
It's a good guess that Charles "Cookie" Lee Thornton was a legal gun owner too when he killed two police officers, two council members, the city's public works director and shot the mayor, Mike Swoboda, twice in the head at a City Council meeting in Kirkwood, MO on February 7.
Shooters in two Valentine's Day-timed massacres last year--Sulejman Talovic who killed five in Salt Lake City's Trolley Square mall and Vincent J. Dortch who killed three at the Philadelphia Naval Shipyard--also breezed through background checks. Talovic, a Bossnian immigrant, bought his weapon at Sportsman's Fastcash, a pawn shop chain, without even showing second identification as required of legal aliens investigators think.
Bart A. Ross, a Polish immigrant who shot Federal Judge Joan Lefkow's husband and mother in Chicago 2005, was also a legal gun owner.
So were Terry Ratzmann, who fatally shot seven in a church service in Milwaukee in 2005, Chai Vang, who killed six Wisconsin hunters in 2004 and Jennifer Sanmarco who shot and killed six at a Goleta, CA postal facility in 2006.
And of course there was Virginia Tech's Seung-Hui Cho.
Of course the gun lobby likes to use mass shootings for recruitment.
Do you really want to be unarmed when a human volcano explodes because he lost his job, went off his meds or his girlfriend dumped him it asks--as if it had nothing to do with arming the volcano.
And as if "good guys" defending themselves against criminals need to purchase multiple guns and automatic weapons as the Kazmierczaks of the world typically do.
But with 20 dead in February alone, the reductionistic equation--1) bad guys get guns illegally 2) the rest of us need them because of 1)-breaks down.
It starts to look less like Outlaw Guns And Only Outlaws Will Have Guns and more like Legalize Easy Guns and Criminals Will Be Legal.
Speaking to a group of Florida Republican women on Valentine's Day before news of the NIU massacre surfaced, Glen Caroline, director of the National Rifle Association's Institute for Legislative Action lamented. "The media never reports on self-defense use of guns. They always report on criminal use of guns." Unfortunately he was about to hear about Kazmierczak.
Martha Rosenberg's work has appeared in the Chicago Tribune, L.A. Times, San Francisco Chronicle, Boston Globe, Providence Journal. Arizona Republic, New Orleans Times-Picayune and other newspapers. Now she also shares her views with YubaNet.com's readers.

In the interest of fostering civil and issue-oriented discourse, YubaNet does not publish reader comments identified by anonymous Internet "handles" (fake user ID names like "farfromthinkin"). Your full and real name will be published with your comment. Your email address will not be shown, unless you specifically "uncheck" the box 'Hide my email.' By submitting a comment you consent to our rules.
Comments
Greg Moody
05 Mar 2008, 00:35
In a relativistic society, who cares if someone kills someone else? In our
endeavor to remove all morals and values from the political arena, we have
sent the message to people that morals elsewhere in society are also
relativistic. If you fail to see where I am going with this argument...ask
10 people if we should have ended slavery. Then ask those same 10 people
if we should have/end abortion. Our political solution was to end slavery
by law because of the moral vacuum caused by the evil of slavery...yet
opponents to abortion remove the moral equation by refusing to consider the
implications of life existing since conception. Can you prove where life
begins...I can't. Neither can you, but we continue to have abortion based
on removing the question of right/wrong because it would be determining
values for someone. It becomes a choice rather than a moral question.
Returning to the question of legal guns. Will great wrong be done with a
gun? Sure...who can deny that? Is the problem the gun? Let us think about
this... is this a political question or a moral one? Oops! The gun is
political. The act is moral. Which do you solve? I propose that the
moral solution is the only one that matters. Will crimes of insanity
continue to happen if we remove the gun from society (if it would even be
possible or desirable)...of course they will. Can you kill 32 people with
a razor sharp katana in a crowded school? Probably not, but the question is
not a number problem!!! 32 or 1 makes no difference. One person is too
many. The focus of our government, schools, media and other pundits need
to be on morals. Why are you so afraid of introducing values into our
political life? Are you really afraid that the Pope will rule America? Do
you actually believe that the framers of this little experiment meant for
this land to extinguish moral controversy for the sake of political
agreement?
Where grave moral problems are evident, it is catastrophic to separate
politics and law from moral consideration. A worthy goal to champion
would be the reintroduction into "polis" of moral and religious argument.
Anything else will and has impoverished our civic government and our
ability to participate in that same government.
Nick Wilcox
21 Feb 2008, 03:38
Scott Thorpe, our homegrown rampage killer (January 10, 2001)was also a
legal gun owner and used a registered weapon. However, he was also in
possession of 11 illegal guns, a fact which our local authorities never saw
fit to investigate. Sadly, guns have infiltrated so deeply into our
culture that the killing will go on unabated until our politicians, like
the tinman, get a heart.
|