YubaNet.com
Thursday, November 20 2008

            We Deliver News to the Sierra
News Fire News spacer Latest News spacer Regional News spacer California News spacer USA News spacer World News spacer Op-Ed spacer Enviro News spacer Sci Tech News spacer Life spacer Odd News spacer Cartoons spacer
Features The Calendar features Classifieds features Weather features Sierra NightSky features Maps features YubaNet Links features YubaNet Horoscope features Road Conditions features Home spacer
Enviro
 

New Report Documents Air Pollution Burden of Big Ships in Coastal Communities

By: Environmental Defense Fund

Washington, DC, October 3, 2008 - A new report released today shows that large ocean-going ships -- such as cruise ships and container ships -- in U.S. waters, are big pollution emitters. These large ships release dangerous diesel pollution that threatens the health of U.S. port communities, are a major source of urban smog pollution, and are one of the world's largest emitters of global warming gases.

The report by Environmental Defense Fund (EDF), "Floating Smokestacks: A Call for Action to Clean Up Shipping Pollution," also examines pollution in the ports of the Lower Mississippi, Seattle/Tacoma, Los Angeles/Long Beach, New York/New Jersey, Houston/Galveston, and the Great Lakes.

The report recommends protective policy action at next week's pivotal meeting of the International Maritime Organization. This international body will meet to consider standards to significantly reduce pollution from these large ocean-going ships by requiring cleaner engines, pollution control technologies and cleaner fuel.

Ocean-going ships are powered by large diesel engines that run on an extremely dirty grade of fuel, called bunker fuel or residual fuel. It contains approximately 1,800 times the sulfur content of the U.S. diesel fuel standards for other major diesel engines.

"Large ocean-going ships are vital for international commerce, but they also are ‘floating smokestacks' that are big emitters of harmful air pollution," said Janea Scott, EDF senior attorney. "Next week's international meeting is critical in cleaning up the pollution from these big ships and navigating the way to healthier air for the millions of people who live in coastal communities."

The report analyzed the latest available data from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (2001) and found that large ocean-going ships in the United States emitted:

* Approximately 54,000 tons of particulate matter (PM 2.5), equivalent to the emissions from about 117 coal-fired power plants; PM 2.5 is a deadly form of air pollution associated with lung disease and other respiratory diseases.

* Approximately 745,000 tons of smog-forming nitrogen oxides (NOx), equivalent to the NOx emissions from 94 coal-fired power plants.

* Nearly 40% of all sulfur dioxide emitted by the transportation sector; sulfur dioxide can transform into harmful fine particles and can also fall back to the earth as acid rain.

* Ocean-going ships are responsible for about 3% of global carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions that cause climate change.

Currently, ocean-going vessels are subject only to weak international emissions standards. The clean air standards that apply to these high-polluting engines have lagged behind other major source categories in the transportation sector. Without strong regulations, pollution from these high-emitting engines will increase.

EDF's new report also recommends: 1) Establishing protective limits on pollution around America's coasts through cleaner fuel standards; 2) Addressing global warming pollution from ships; and 3) Taking actions to reduce or eliminate emissions from ships that are near or in ports by cutting idling emissions when these big ships are at dock.

Download the full report.

AddThis Social Bookmark Button AddThis Feed Button


In the interest of fostering civil and issue-oriented discourse, YubaNet does not publish reader comments identified by anonymous Internet "handles" (fake user ID names like "farfromthinkin"). Your full and real name will be published with your comment. Your email address will not be shown, unless you specifically "uncheck" the box 'Hide my email.' By submitting a comment you consent to our rules.

Comments

Carol K
06 Oct 2008, 01:22
It didn't mention San Francisco. When I lived in the southern part of the city in view of the ocean, I could see the lights of ships anchored out all night, and could smell something worse than creosote or tar, much less diesel, wafting onshore with the prevailing eastward breeze. I suspected they were burning off or dumping toxic chemicals before they came in the Golden Gate. The Coastal Commission told me something like: that doesn't happen because there was no law against it. (?!)
*Name:
Email:
Notify me about new comments on this page
Hide my email
*Text:
Security Image:

Visual CAPTCHA


 

 
Subscribe to YubaNetNews, our weekly newsletter featuring the latest regional stories and more.


Latest Headlines

Enviro

Conservation Successes Offer Hope for Eventual Reintroduction of Endangered Thick-billed Parrots to the U.S.

Climate change opens new avenue for spread of invasive plants

World Toilet Day Recognizes 2.5 Billion People Without Proper Sanitation

New EPA Rule Leaves U.S. Waterways at Risk

New Report: Video Games are Energy Drains

Alpine rivers hold important clues for preserving biodiversity and coping with climate change

Serious Contamination of U.S. Sugar Lands Ignored for Decades

Colombian indigenous travel to New York to urge investors not to buy shares of Colombian state oil company Ecopetrol

Acid Soils in Slovakia Tell Somber Tale

Humans and elephants on collision course in South Asia


More

 
 


NEWS . Fire News . Latest . Regional . California . USA . World . Op-Ed . Enviro . Sci/Tech . Life . Odd News . Cartoons
FEATURES . The Calendar . Classifieds . Weather . Sierra NightSky . Maps . Horoscope. YubaNetLinks . Road Conditions
YubaNet.com . Advertising . About Us . Contact Us . Terms of Use . Privacy

YubaNet.com © 2008
Nevada City, California (530) 478-9600