From YubaNet.com

Regional
"Vested Rights" for Blue Lead Mine Up for Approval by Planning Commission Today
Author: YubaNet
Published on Apr 21, 2010 - 10:09:01 AM

NEVADA CITY, Calif. April 20, 2010 - The Nevada County Planning Commission will consider the Request by Robert White for determination of vested right to mine the 74.37-acre "Blue Lead Mine." at 2:00 p.m. on Thursday, April 22.

See update at the end of the article.

The item is continued from the March 25 hearing, where the five commissioners chose to completely disregard staff's arguments recommending a denial of the vested rights claim. Instead, they adopted a motion of intent to grant the request and directed staff to prepare findings supporting this decision.

The commissioners are volunteers appointed by their respective supervisors.

The Blue Lead Mine is located at 18272 Red Dog Road in Nevada City, where Red Dog Road meets You Bet Road. Acquired in March 2007 by Golden Girl Mine and subsequently renamed Blue Lead, the property is owned by Tucker White. His father, Robert White, is the applicant for the vested right to mine.

Why "Vested Rights" Instead of a Use Permit?

A vested right to mine basically "grandfathers" an existing, operating mine into the county or state system. Any vested mine does not need to apply for a mining permit to the county and no California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) document for the mining operation itself is required. Another exemption concerns grading permits for roads, landing pads, staging areas, etc. Culverts and diversion ponds are also exempt from any oversight under the vested right to mine.The advantages granted under the vested right are numerous and exclusively profit the applicant.

Blue Lead has already been cited by the county, BLM and the Regional Water Quality Control Board for a host of violations. Obtaining vested rights would dispense with permit requirements and allow the continuation of mining activities on the property.

Vested rights still requires annual reporting, a lead-agency approved reclamation plan, and an annual financial assurance (bonding). Failure to have either a complete reclamation plan or financial assurance is subject to a penalty of up to $5,000 per day and may also result in a cease-and-desist order, according to Don Drysdale, Public Affairs Officer for the Office of Mine Reclamation.

Blue Lead submitted an incomplete reclamation plan in September 2009 and has so far not provided any additional information requested by the county. This is the first time any plan has been submitted for the property.

"Any mine that had a two-year break in production without a valid reclamation plan and Interim Management Plan is deemed to have been abandoned under SMARA and thus is ineligible for vested rights," Drysdale told YubaNet.

Local Property Owners, Historians Contradict Blue Lead Representations

Blue Lead's neighbor Tom Brown is directly affected by the proposed operation and the work already undertaken without a permit. His property borders Blue Lead and a road was bulldozed through his land -- without his consent -- by Blue Lead Mine LLC. Mr. Brown, who has been residing in Virginia since 2006, only learned about the trespass when BLM contacted him in October of 2008.

BLM, also a neighbor of the project, issued a notice of violation and a Cease and Desist order to Blue Lead Mine LLC for "a knowing and willful trespass against the United States when he bladed access roads to his Blue Lead Mine across BLM-administered public lands without first getting authorization from BLM. His trespass actions also included building settling ponds on public land (in part), storing equipment, occupancy of camper trailers and the removal/burial of cadastral survey monuments." Tucker White, on behalf of Blue Lead Mine LLC, was issued the violation notice and paid $18,006 in damages to BLM. No damages were paid to Mr. Brown.

In his written statement to the Planning Commission, Mr. Brown speaks directly to the vested right to mine and the important issue of "abandonment":

Prior to 2004 we visited this parcel frequently -- at least once a year, and often three or four times a year. Since moving to Virginia our inspection visits occur much less often. In reviewing my property records I've noted that my last inspection of the property was in May 2006. During all visits to the property it's my habit to walk all the property lines and "check all the corners." When I walk along the property line between my parcel and APN # -12 I can see a large portion of that neighboring parcel. After the inspection in May 2006, I made the following entry in my file: "nothing unusual was noted." I certainly would have known if any mining activity was occurring. The fact is that between 1986 and May 2006, the land was unused, and there certainly was no mining. My personal observations about the use of APN# -12 supports the Staff's belief that the parcel has been abandoned or idle and that the vested right is destroyed.
Brown concludes his letter:
Mr. White has run roughshod over many agencies in other parts of the state. Now he wants to continue his legacy in Nevada County. We hope that the Nevada County Planning Commission will draw a line in the sand of Greenhorn Creek and the Bear River and refuse to allow Mr. White to cross that line. Please send a message that his type of behavior will not be tolerated in this county.

In conclusion, we respectfully request a determination from the Planning Commission that the applicant does NOT have a vested right to mine. Please be advised that should the Commission decide to grant the vested right to mine it would be our intention to appeal such a decision.
Author and historian Dave Comstock, a resident of the neighborhood since 1968, also sent comments to the planning staff after the March meeting. He was not aware of the meeting taking place, otherwise he would have appeared in person and shared his knowledge of the property with the commission, Comstock told YubaNet. He said he was quite appalled at the commission's decision and commented on the alleged intent to mine by the previous owners:
Before they bought the diggings (for an insignificant sum) the Brady family owned no property at [sic] in the You Bet-Red Dog area except up here on Chalk Bluff, and Jerry's mother gave away or sold all but 80 acres (which have never been mined). The family had always worked for other companies and lived mostly on BLM land. I knew just about everybody who prospected (or sniped) for gold in this area from 1968 on, and all of them worked along the running streams with shovels and picks. No one worked in the Blue Lead section because there was no running water.
Enter Jerry Brady. The native of You Bet now resides in San Pedro, CA. He is the author of "You Bet, California Gold Fever" which delves extensively into the history of the area. Blue Lead Mine LLC produced an affidavit signed by Brady, which gives the impression at first glance that an "intent" to mine by previous owners existed. A closer reading, however, reveals that Mr. Brady talks about the "You Bet Mine, which included the Arkansas and Greenhorn Placer Mine and the Star and Stehr Placer Mine (collectively, the "Property").

The Brady family acquired the Greater You Bet Mine property in 1993. In 2007, the Brady Family Partnership sold the property (the 3 parcels comprising the 74.37-acre "Blue Lead Mine) to Tucker and Kellie White.

Brady's recollection of the intent to mine the "Property" does not conflict with either Comstock or Brown's statements. Indeed, by referring to the Property, Brady talks about the greater You Bet Mine, not the parcels acquired by Blue Lead Mine LLC. In the final chapter of his book, Brady writes: "The Bradys know where to dig to uncover Ah Tie's last stand and in fact intend to do just that when the time is right." The Ah Tie mine is located more than 5 miles southeast of the Blue Lead mine.

Brady also states in the author bio:"As time goes on, his love for his home country burns deeper, and along with intense memories of his own childhood experiences, he hopes to someday rebuild the family's old You Bet home in its former image, and eventually establishing other historical monuments to preserve the heritage of a great little town deserted, but not forgotten, You Bet, California."

Brady doesn't mention in his book that he ever intended to mine the Blue Lead property.

Issues before the Planning Commission on Thursday

The staff report prepared for the meeting includes the following comments: "Due to several issues that have arisen since the last hearing, staff recommends that the Planning Commission reopen the hearing: 1) More information is needed from the applicant to establish the scope of the vested right; 2) New information has been provided by the Office of Mine Reclamation; and 3) Staff has received several requests to reopen the hearing and new information has been provided by members of the public."

The scope of the vested right can be divided into geographical and operational scope. Does the vested right extend to the whole property, or only to previously mined areas? By using modern equipment, production rates will increase exponentially. Is the greater production rate included in the vested right? The staff report states: "The applicant has not provided any evidence of past production amounts but will be provided the opportunity to do so at the hearing, if reopened."

Other issues such as traffic impacts and water provisioning and discharge will not be addressed in this hearing.

Since the March 25 hearing, staff has received 15 written comments from the public, including 6 requests to reopen the public hearing.

Additional Background on Blue Lead Mine LLC

The Blue Lead operation was originally owned by Golden Girl Mining Company, but the Whites spun off Blue Lead Mine LLC in September 2008. County staff describes the parcels as follows: "The 76.9-acre subject property is located at 18272 Red Dog Road, Nevada City, on three parcels identified as Assessor's Parcel Numbers 38-390-12, -20, and -21. The site is located at the lower end of Red Dog Road approximately 8 miles east of Grass Valley Valley/Nevada City, on the east side of Greenhorn Creek where Red Dog Road meets You Bet Road. The site is located near the historic communities of "You Bet," and "Red Dog," in the Red Dog Mining District in western Nevada County." A portion of the site was mined from the 1850's to early 1900's by hydraulic mining.

The three parcels were acquired by the Whites in March 2007 and as early as October 2007, inquiries were made to the county by third parties about mining equipment being hauled over Red Dog Road and the installation of gates and signs on the property.

In January 2008, the applicant picked up a Use Permit application at the county.

April 2008: Site visits by agencies. BLM issued a Cease and Desist Notice on April 17, 2008. According to county staff's report: "The notice indicates that the applicant committed a knowing and willful trespass against the United States when he bladed access roads to his Blue Lead Mine across BLM-administered public lands without first getting authorization from BLM. His trespass actions also included building settling ponds on public land (in part), storing equipment, occupancy of camper trailers and the removal/burial of cadastral survey monuments. Tucker White has subsequently complied with the terms of the Notice, including the payment of $18,006 in damages. However, BLM has noted that White appears to continue accessing his property using the road he widened/bladed on the adjacent BLM property, without an access easement." According to BLM, no right-of-way has been given to White as of today.

June 2008: the Regional Water Quality Control Board issued a Notice of Violation of the Clean Water Act to Tucker White. The staff reports states: "On August 12, 2008, DFG sent Tucker White a report of the subject property that included photographs, plot maps, DFG tree impact analysis, and a water pollution laboratory report. The report was also copied to DFG enforcement staff and requested an analysis of the actions for possible enforcement and a chain of custody record. On August 23, 2009, DFG filed a formal complaint with the Nevada County District Attorney’s Office to review the evidence in this case, specifically with regard to violations of Fish and Game Code Section 1602(a)(1), Change Stream or Lake without Notification to DFG, and 5650(a)(6), Water Pollution from Sediment."

August 2008: Applicant turns in incomplete application to the county; additional work observed.

September 2008: Northern Sierra Air Quality Management District (NSAQMD)submits the following comments to planning staff: "Based on the information provided in the project description (received by the District August 27, 2008) and the Environmental Assessment (received by the District September 8, 2008), the project will require an Authority to Construct/Permit to Operate from the District prior to construction (making the District a Responsible Agency under CEQA)... Per District Rule 226, a Dust Control Plan must be submitted to and approved by the District prior to surface disturbance for any project involving the disturbance of more than one acre. It is the District’s understanding that some construction activity has already occurred on the site, without the required Dust Control Plan. Thus, the District requests that the applicant submit a Dust Control Plan for approval as soon as possible. Failure to submit a Dust Control Plan in a timely manner will result in a Notice of Violation and monetary penalty."

October 2008: Formal complaint, Code case opens

April 2009: County receives another complaint

May 2009: Applicant attempts to get exploration permit on adjoining BLM land without notifying the county

August 2009: County issues Notice of Violation of SMARA

August 2009: County issues Order to Comply with SMARA and sets hearing date

September 2009: Staff visits site, observes new violations

September 2009: Applicant submits revised Reclamation Plan & vested mining rights info. The plan is still incomplete.

April 19, 2010: Northern Sierra Air Quality Management District has not received an application for Authority to Construct/Permit to Operate by Blue Lead Mine LLC.

April 21, 2010: One day before the hearing, property taxes on all three parcels are unpaid: APN 38-390-12, APN 38-390-20 and APN 38-390-21 for a total of $8,839.88 with $4,807.76 being delinquent.

Operations in Other Counties

Operating as "Golden Girl Mine" in Plumas County in 2006, notices of violation were issued by the Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) - a Notice of Violation for illegal discharges of sediment to Lights Creek - and the Forest Service - Notice of Noncompliance with the Plan of Operations. The Office of Mine Reclamation (OMR) inspected this illegal mine on August 28, 2009, finding abandoned equipment, trash, and hazardous materials. According to OMR, this mine was abandoned with approximately two acres disturbed.

Tucker White was convicted in Lassen County Court of violating Fish and Game Code 1603, unauthorized alteration of a streambed, in January of 2001, according to the county staff report.

April 21, 2010 1:55 p.m. Update

Blue Lead Mine LLC's attorney submitted his response to the new staff report. While dismissing public comments as irrelevant and asking "that the Planning Commission set aside Staff's wild recommendations," he also writes: "Blue Lead will still be required to comply with SMARA, CEQA, state and federal regulations and all environmental laws."

Blue Lead Mine LLC's compliance record so far:

- a Code Compliance case
- a Notice of Violation of SMARA and an Order to Comply from Nevada County,
- a Notice of Violation of the Clean Water Act from the Regional Water Quality Control Board
- a Cease and Desist Notice from BLM, including a $18,006 fine.



Related article:
Blue Lead Mine Dazzles Planning Commission - "Vested Right to Mine" May Be Granted

© Copyright YubaNet.com