YubaNet.com
Monday, November 24 2014

            We Deliver News to the Sierra
News Fire News spacer Latest News spacer Regional News spacer California News spacer USA News spacer World News spacer Op-Ed spacer Enviro News spacer Sci Tech News spacer Life spacer Odd News spacer Cartoons spacer
Features The Calendar features features Weather features Sierra NightSky features features features Road Conditions features Home spacer
US
 

350 Economists Warn President and Congress: Sequestration Spending Cuts Could Kill Recovery. Economy Needs Growth and Jobs, Not Sequestration Austerity


    Google+    

By: Institute for America's Future

Washington, DC February 26, 2013 - With sequestration spending cuts due to begin on Friday, 350 prominent economists issued a statement today warning that "the fragile recovery is threatened by obsessive concern with cutting deficits that has infected both parties." The economists from universities and research groups across the U.S. reminded politicians that the U.S. economy is still "marked by mass unemployment, rising poverty, and declining wages." They warned that big spending cuts aimed at reducing deficits could throw the economy back into recession.

Entitled Jobs and Growth, Not Austerity, the statement was written by Robert Borosage and Roger Hickey, co-directors of the Institute for America's Future and by Robert Kuttner of The American Prospect. The full statement and list of over 350 signing economists can be found at jobsnotausterity.org.

The economists point to the cautionary example of European countries that have in plunged themselves into recession as a result of misguided policies aimed at reducing deficits. The economists declare, "As Great Britain, Ireland, Spain and Greece have shown, inflicting austerity on a weak economy leads to deeper recession, rising unemployment and increasing misery."

One of the authors of the statement, Institute for America's Future Co-Director, Roger Hickey, warned that previous spending cuts and budget deals have already slowed growth and that more austerity could tip the US into recession. "The spending cuts mandated by sequestration come at a time when many retailers, like Walmart, are projecting weakening demand on the part of consumers, hit hard by the end of the payroll tax cuts. On top of this slowing consumer buying power, Congressional Budget Office director Douglas Elmendorf told Congress that if the $1.2 trillion across-the-board sequestration spending cuts are allowed to take place in March, the US economy would lose 750,000 jobs in 2013." Hickey noted that other analysts have predicted sequestration would result in a loss of up to 1 million jobs.

While some corporate leaders, such as those affiliated with Fix the Debt, have urged Congress to take a hard line on deficit reduction, other corporate leaders have begun to warn that sequestration cuts – or even a "grand bargain" aimed at avoiding sequestration – could so damage the economic recovery that the US could be stuck in low growth or no growth mode for years into the future. The economists releasing today's statement caution that the elements of a bad "grand bargain" could have such a contractionary impact on the still-fragile economy that the US could sink like the European nations into another serious recession and a decade of high unemployment.

"To make sure the American people are not crippled by another lost decade of joblessness," the economists call for "presidential leadership — and congressional action — to spur jobs and growth, not dangerous austerity."

The full statement and list of over 350 signing economists can be found at jobsnotausterity.org.

Jobs and Growth Not Austerity

The U.S. economy, once in free-fall toward a new depression, has begun to recover. But we are still mired in a prolonged slump marked by mass unemployment, rising poverty, and declining wages. And the fragile recovery is threatened by obsessive concern with cutting deficits that has infected both parties.

As even Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke recognizes, it is long term unemployment, not excessive deficits or debt, that is now inflicting the greatest human toll and economic damage. Polls show that voters agree joblessness and a bad economy are much higher priorities than deficits.

Yet too many in Washington are fixated on cutting public spending to balance the budget, not on how to put people back to work and get our economy going. There is no theory of economics that explains how we can deflate our way to recovery. Businesses are not basing investment decisions on how much Congress cuts the debt in 2023. As Great Britain, Ireland, Spain and Greece have shown, inflicting austerity on a weak economy leads to deeper recession, rising unemployment and increasing misery.

In a deep recession, deficit reduction is a moving target. If you cut spending and consumer purchasing power in an already depressed economy, unemployment rises and revenues fall — and the goal of a smaller deficit keeps receding like a mirage in a desert. When private purchasing power is depressed by the aftermath of a financial collapse, only public investment can make up the gap.

The budget hawks have the sequence backwards. Public outlay for jobs and recovery come first, growth is restored, and revenues follow. Budget cuts in a deep slump lead only to a deeper slump.

The government should invest in areas vital to our economy — to repair crumbling infrastructure, to build 21st-century smart-grid, public transportation and renewable energy systems, and to create public and private sector jobs. We should also help states prevent layoffs of teachers and other public servants, make early care and higher education more affordable, and create public service jobs throughout the nation. It can do so by borrowing at record low interest rates. We can also stimulate recovery without increasing deficits by increasing taxes on the wealthy and pumping the proceeds directly into the economy.

Both bipartisan and conservative deficit reduction plans — Simpson-Bowles, Rivlin-Domenici, and the Republican budget — magically assume a recovery to "normal" levels of employment. Yet, the economy is nowhere near normal growth, and budget cutting will only retard growth. At the end of the year, we face a congressionally-created "fiscal cliff," with automatic "sequestration" spending cuts everyone agrees should be stopped to prevent a double-dip recession. That threat has led to backroom negotiations, backed by a multimillion dollar public relations campaign, toward a "grand bargain" that would maintain tax give-aways for the rich; cut Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid; and impose new, job-killing spending cuts. This is no bargain, and it should be rejected.

President Obama should be commended for proposing a new jobs program. But unless the balance of power in Congress changes dramatically, there is a serious danger that after the election the austerity lobby will prevail.

We need jobs first. With recovery, deficit reduction will come of its own accord thanks to increased revenues in an improving economy. That was the case in the three decades after World War II — when the debt to GDP ratio declined from over 120 percent of GDP in 1945 to under 30 percent by 1978.

In 1945, our leaders placed a priority on putting people to work, not cutting spending. So government doubled down with public investments like the GI bill, housing, and highways — and widespread collective bargaining and equal opportunity laws made sure the rewards of growth were widely shared. Today, we need the same scale of public investments that made sure the greatest generation and their children enjoyed growth, opportunity, and shared prosperity.

In the face of today's weak economy, the Federal Reserve has vowed to sustain extraordinary measures until unemployment comes down and the economy picks up. But as Chairman Ben Bernanke observed, very low interest rates alone cannot fix this economy. To make sure the American people are not crippled by another lost decade of joblessness, we need presidential leadership — and congressional action — to spur jobs and growth, not dangerous austerity.

 

Help us bring you more news. Be a real reader: Support YubaNet

By submitting a comment you consent to our rules. You must use your real first and last name, not a nickname or alias. A comment here is just like a letter to the editor or a post on Facebook. Thank you.

 

Latest Headlines

US

Feds Agree to Protect More Habitat for East Coast's Most Endangered Whales by 2016

In light of near misses at JFK, Sen. Schumer calls on OMB and FAA to get new drone regulations out the door ASAP

The Lancet: Over a million US military veterans lacked healthcare coverage in 2012

Advocates Applaud Publishers for Removing Climate Change Denialism from Texas Textbooks, Putting Education Ahead of Politics

Ohio Exonerates Former Death Row Inmate 39 Years After Conviction

Obama Administration Ends 'Secure Communities' Program

Immigration Plan Laudable But Incomplete; Harsh Treatment at Border, Detention of Families Unaddressed

Low-Wage Crisis Hits American Manufacturing


More

 

 

 

 

NEWS . Fire News . Latest . Regional . California . USA . World . Op-Ed . Enviro . Sci/Tech . Life . Odd News . Cartoons
FEATURES . The Calendar .Weather . Sierra NightSky. Road Conditions
YubaNet.com . Advertising. About Us . Support YubaNet . Contact Us . Terms of Use . Privacy

YubaNet.com © 1999-2014
Nevada City, California (530) 478-9600