YubaNet.com
Tuesday, February 9 2010

            We Deliver News to the Sierra
News Fire News spacer Latest News spacer Regional News spacer California News spacer USA News spacer World News spacer Op-Ed spacer Enviro News spacer Sci Tech News spacer Life spacer Odd News spacer Cartoons spacer
Features The Calendar features Classifieds features Weather features Sierra NightSky features Maps features YubaNet Links features YubaNet Horoscope features Road Conditions features Home spacer
US
 

Rand, University of Florida, Offer First Statistical Test of Gays in Military
New Research Shows Openly Gay Service Not Linked to Unit Cohesion

Share on Twitter

By: Palm Center

SANTA BARBARA, Calif. Nov. 10, 2009 - In the first ever statistical analysis of whether openly gay service has any impact on military readiness, a new study shows that knowing a gay or lesbian unit member has no bearing on the unit's cohesion. The study, "Attitudes of Iraq and Afghanistan War Veterans toward Gay and Lesbian Service Members," appears in the prestigious journal, Armed Forces and Society, and was written by two prominent researchers, Bonnie Moradi of the University of Florida and Laura Miller of the Rand Corporation. Rand is a prominent, military-created think tank which has advised the Pentagon on national security issues for generations.

In 1993, Rand conducted the largest study of gays in the military and found that sexual orientation was "not germane" to military service, but resistance by the Joint Chiefs of Staff blocked the lifting of the gay ban and "don't ask, don't tell" was implemented as part of a compromise.

"This is the strongest evidence yet that homosexuality has no effect on military service," said Dr. Nathaniel Frank, senior research fellow at the Palm Center, which sponsored the new study. Frank said that large-scale non-enforcement of the policy in recent years has allowed researchers to conduct empirical studies on openly gay troops, who serve in large numbers despite the official ban. "We've known for years that the 'unit cohesion' rationale for excluding open gays was not backed up by research," he said, "but this goes a crucial step further: we no longer must rely on the absence of evidence supporting discrimination, but have proof-positive that gays serve openly without undercutting their units."

The new study analyzed war veterans' ratings of unit cohesion and readiness, and found that knowing a gay or lesbian unit member was not statistically correlated with either cohesion or readiness. According to the study, "the data indicated no associations between knowing a lesbian or gay unit member and ratings of perceived unit cohesion or readiness. Instead, findings pointed to the importance of leadership and instrumental quality in shaping perceptions of unit cohesion and readiness." The study also found that 40% of returning war troops supported the current "don't ask, don't tell" policy, 28% opposed it and 33% were neutral. In 1993, said the study, 75% supported the full gay ban, revealing a dramatic decline in anti-gay opposition in the last sixteen years.

In Frank's new book on "don't ask, don't tell," Unfriendly Fire: How the Gay Ban Undermines the Military and Weakens America, retired senior officers go on record saying that the unit cohesion rationale was never rooted in evidence, but in the personal morality and even prejudice of military brass. Retired Rear Admiral John Hutson, for instance, who became Judge Advocate General of the Navy, helped formulate "don't ask, don't tell" in 1993.

"The decisions were based on nothing," he tells Frank in Unfriendly Fire. "It wasn't empirical, it wasn't studied, it was completely visceral, intuitive." Hutson said the policy was based on the "fears and prejudices" of military leaders and that they consulted virtually no research "so we hung everything on the question of unit cohesion. That was the catch phrase." Franks said that today's data confirms what many long suspected, that "'unit cohesion' was just the latest rationalization for a policy with no honest rationale."

The Palm Center is a think tank at the University of California, Santa Barbara. Since 1998, the Center has been a leader in commissioning and disseminating research in the areas of gender, sexuality, and the military. For more information visit www.palmcenter.ucsb.edu.

AddThis Social Bookmark Button AddThis Feed Button


In the interest of fostering civil and issue-oriented discourse, YubaNet does not publish reader comments identified by anonymous Internet "handles" (fake user ID names like "farfromthinkin"). Your full and real name will be published with your comment. Your email address will not be shown, unless you specifically "uncheck" the box 'Hide my email.' By submitting a comment you consent to our rules.

Comments

No comments yet
*Name:
Email:
Notify me about new comments on this page
Hide my email
*Text:
Security Image:

Visual CAPTCHA


 

 
Subscribe to YubaNetNews, our weekly newsletter featuring the latest regional stories and more.


Latest Headlines

US

Report Backs EPA Classification of PERC as Likely Human Carcinogen and Toxic to Nervous System

America's National Parks Are Likely To See More Guns

Experts Highlight How Latino Voters Will Influence 2010 Elections

Obama Administration Hired Nation's Top Anti-Union Law Firm

Professor: Obama Should Issue Executive Order on Greenhouse Gas Emissions

NRDC Endorses New Certification for Safe, Ethical Electronic Waste Recycling

Toyota Announces Voluntary Recall on 2010 Prius and 2010 Lexus HS 250h Vehicles to Update ABS Software

ACLU Challenges Illegal Disfranchisement Of American Indian Voters In South Dakota

NSF Launches Open Government Web Page


More

 
 


NEWS . Fire News . Latest . Regional . California . USA . World . Op-Ed . Enviro . Sci/Tech . Life . Odd News . Cartoons
FEATURES . The Calendar . Classifieds . Weather . Sierra NightSky . Maps . Horoscope. YubaNetLinks . Road Conditions
YubaNet.com . Advertising . About Us . Contact Us . Terms of Use . Privacy

YubaNet.com © 2010
Nevada City, California (530) 478-9600