September 6, 2017 – Yesterday, the Trump administration announced that it will be rescinding the DACA program, which has protected 800,000 young adults from deportation. President Trump released a statement defending this heartless, inhumane decision. For accuracy and context, the SPLC has annotated the president’s statement below.
“As President, my highest duty is to defend the American people and the Constitution of the United States of America. At the same time, I do not favor punishing children, most of whom are now adults, for the actions of their parents. But we must also recognize that we are nation of opportunity because we are a nation of laws. 
“The legislative branch, not the executive branch, writes these laws 
– this is the bedrock of our Constitutional system, which I took a solemn oath to preserve, protect, and defend. 
“In June of 2012, President Obama bypassed Congress to give work permits, social security numbers, and federal benefits  to approximately 800,000 illegal immigrants currently between the ages of 15 and 36. The typical recipients of this executive amnesty, known as DACA, are in their twenties. Legislation offering these same benefits had been introduced in Congress on numerous occasions and rejected each time. 
“In referencing the idea of creating new immigration rules unilaterally, President Obama admitted that ‘I can’t just do these things by myself’ – and yet that is exactly what he did, making an end-run around Congress and violating the core tenets that sustain our Republic. 
“Officials from 10 States  are suing over the program , requiring my Administration to make a decision regarding its legality.  The Attorney General of the United States, the Attorneys General of many states, and virtually all other top legal experts  have advised that the program is unlawful and unconstitutional and cannot be successfully defended in court.
“There can be no path to principled immigration reform if the executive branch is able to rewrite or nullify federal laws at will. 
“The temporary implementation of DACA by the Obama Administration, after Congress repeatedly rejected this amnesty-first approach, also helped spur a humanitarian crisis – the massive surge of unaccompanied minors from Central America  including, in some cases, young people who would become members of violent gangs throughout our country  , such as MS-13. 
“Only by the reliable enforcement of immigration law can we produce safe communities , a robust middle class, and economic fairness for all Americans.
“Therefore, in the best interests of our country, and in keeping with the obligations of my office, the Department of Homeland Security will begin an orderly transition and wind-down of DACA, one that provides minimum disruption.  While new applications for work permits will not be accepted, all existing work permits will be honored until their date of expiration up to two full years from today. Furthermore, applications already in the pipeline will be processed, as will renewal applications for those facing near-term expiration. This is a gradual process, not a sudden phase out. Permits will not begin to expire for another six months, and will remain active for up to 24 months. Thus, in effect, I am not going to just cut DACA off, but rather provide a window of opportunity for Congress to finally act.
“Our enforcement priorities remain unchanged. We are focused on criminals, security threats, recent border-crossers, visa overstays, and repeat violators. I have advised the Department of Homeland Security that DACA recipients are not enforcement priorities unless they are criminals, are involved in criminal activity, or are members of a gang. 
“The decades-long failure of Washington, D.C. to enforce federal immigration law has had both predictable and tragic consequences: lower wages  and higher unemployment for American workers , substantial burdens on local schools  and hospitals , the illicit entry of dangerous drugs and criminal cartels, and many billions of dollars a year in costs paid for by U.S. taxpayers.  Yet few in Washington expressed any compassion for the millions of Americans victimized by this unfair system. Before we ask what is fair to illegal immigrants, we must also ask what is fair to American families, students, taxpayers, and jobseekers.
“Congress now has the opportunity to advance responsible immigration reform that puts American jobs and American security first. We are facing the symptom of a larger problem, illegal immigration, along with the many other chronic immigration problems Washington has left unsolved. We must reform our green card system, which now favors low-skilled immigration and puts immense strain on U.S. taxpayers. We must base future immigration on merit – we want those coming into the country to be able to support themselves financially, to contribute to our economy, and to love our country and the values it stands for. Under a merit-based system, citizens will enjoy higher employment, rising wages, and a stronger middle class. Senators Tom Cotton and David Perdue have introduced the RAISE Act, which would establish this merit-based system  and produce lasting gains for the American People. 
“I look forward to working with Republicans and Democrats in Congress to finally address all of these issues in a manner that puts the hardworking citizens of our country first.
“As I’ve said before, we will resolve the DACA issue with heart and compassion – but through the lawful Democratic process – while at the same time ensuring that any immigration reform we adopt provides enduring benefits for the American citizens we were elected to serve.  We must also have heart and compassion for unemployed, struggling, and forgotten Americans.
“Above all else, we must remember that young Americans have dreams too. Being in government means setting priorities.  Our first and highest priority in advancing immigration reform must be to improve jobs, wages and security for American workers and their families. 
“It is now time for Congress to act!”
 Here, President Trump appeals to the law. Last month, he showed contempt for the law by pardoning Sheriff Joe Arpaio, who had been convicted of criminal contempt of court for intentionally violating a federal court order prohibiting racial profiling. Back to statement.
 Since taking office Trump has bypassed Congress 45 times to issue executive orders. Back to statement.
 As explained by Vox, Trump’s reasoning for rescinding the DACA executive order contradicts his words and actions concerning his Muslim ban executive order. “Exercising some discretion to ensure that 800,000 particularly sympathetic cases out of a total population of about 11 million won’t be targeted is a perfectly reasonable approach,” writes Vox’s Matthew Yglesias, “and Trump absolutely had the option of standing up in court for his right to take that approach. He simply chose not to.” Back to statement.
 DREAMers would have contributed $24.6 billion to Social Security and Medicaid over the next decade. Back to statement.
 The House passed a DREAM Act in 2010, but the bill couldn’t get enough support in that year to get over a Senate filibuster. Back to statement.
 The Supreme Court has not ruled DACA to be unconstitutional. Back to statement.
 The attorney general of Tennessee backed away from the suit last week, citing the “human element” and saying that “there is a better approach.” Back to statement.
 The attorneys general sent Trump a letter threatening to sue the administration. They did not file a lawsuit. Back to statement.
 A group of 100 law professors from around the country have said they disagree with Trump. They say DACA is constitutional. Back to statement.
 For comparison, Trump’s Muslim ban executive order, made without legislative approval, drastically complicated the immigration process for many immigrants and refugees. Back to statement.
 DACA critics contend that inaccurate reporting on DACA in Central American newspapers led to this “massive surge of unaccompanied minors.” According to the Huffington Post, the children who crossed the border were more likely motivated by a potential reunion with family than changes in U.S. immigration policy. Back to statement.
 Many families fled Central America to the United States because of violent gangs. Back to statement.
 Trump has repeatedly used MS-13 to push his hardline immigration policies. Back to statement.
 Research has shown that immigrants commit crimes at lower rates than native-born citizens, and many law enforcement officials believe intensified immigration law enforcement is a policy that actually undermines public safety. Back to statement.
 The 800,000 young people who were brought to this country as children will lose their jobs, health care and access to education. Back to statement.
 To be a DACA recipient, one must have no criminal record. Back to statement.
 According to a report prepared last year by the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, immigration has an overall positive impact on economic growth and small-to-no-effect on wages and employment for native-born workers. Back to statement.
 Economists say there is no clear connection between less immigration and more jobs for native-born workers. Back to statement.
 Education leaders across the country have urged the Trump administration not to end DACA. Back to statement.
 Undocumented immigrants are not a burden on hospitals. They provided a surplus of $35.1 billion to the Medicare Trust Fund between 2000 and 2011, according to a Journal of General Internal Medicine study. DACA recipients have also become medical students and doctors. Back to statement.
 DACA beneficiaries would have contributed $460.3 billion to the U.S. gross domestic product over the next decade. Back to statement.
 This quiz from TIME shows how difficult it is to meet the RAISE Act’s high bar for immigration. Back to statement.
 The RAISE Act reflects the shameful agenda of nativists and white nationalists who fear the growing diversity of our country. Back to statement.
 Those American citizens include children whose parents have been protected by DACA. Back to statement.
 An NBC/Survey Monkey poll released last week showed that nearly two-thirds of Americans support program allowing DREAMers to stay in the country. Back to statement.
 Experts say repealing DACA would worsen the shortage of workers in the United States. Deporting DREAMers would also mean deporting taxpayers. The Cato Institute has estimated a potential $60 billion loss in tax revenue to the federal government and $280 billion hit to economic growth over 10 years. Back to statement.