MEDFORD/SOMERVILLE, Mass. March 11, 2019 – A new comprehensive study of climate change has painted over 5 million pictures of humanity’s potential future, and few foretell an Earth that has not severely warmed. But with immediate action and some luck, there are pathways to a tolerable climate future, according to a research team led by Tufts University.
By adapting a popular computational climate change assessment model to better account for uncertainties in human activity and the atmosphere’s sensitivity to carbon dioxide levels, the researchers created a novel method for exploring the consequences of different climate change futures to better inform policy decisions. The work is detailed in a paper published today in the journal Nature Climate Change: http://dx.
While modern assessment models integrate human activity and climate, within each exist uncertainties that can affect the outcome of the model. For instance, uncertainties in population growth, the economy, technological advancement, and the climate’s sensitivity to greenhouse gases could all affect the predicted results of policies and laws designed to curb global warming. The improved model described in the study helped identify scenarios which led to a more tolerable climate future by exploring a wide range of variation within each uncertainty.
“The consequences of severe warming can be dire. Given this potential for poor outcomes, it can be dangerous to consider only a few expert elicited scenarios,” said Jonathan Lamontagne, Ph.D., assistant professor of Civil and Environmental Engineering at Tufts University and lead author of the study. “Planners need robust frameworks that broadly explore the uncertainty space for unforeseen synergies and failure mechanisms.”
The model used in the study accounts for uncertainties in human activity and climate by exploring millions of scenarios, some of which reveal pathways to a world where warming is limited to 2-degrees Celsius by the year 2100 – a goal most climate experts say is required for a “tolerable” future.
The massive analysis shows that meeting that target is exceptionally difficult in all but the most optimistic climate scenarios. One pathway is to immediately and aggressively pursue carbon-neutral energy production by 2030 and hope that the atmosphere’s sensitivity to carbon emissions is relatively low, according to the study. If climate sensitivity is not low, the window to a tolerable future narrows and in some scenarios, may already be closed.
The researchers emphasize that rapid carbon reduction strategies provide a hedge against the possibility of high climate sensitivity scenarios.
“Despite massive uncertainties in a multitude of sectors, human actions are still the driving factor in determining the long-term climate. Uncertainty is sometimes interpreted as an excuse for delaying action. Our research shows that uncertainty can be a solid reason to take immediate action,” said Lamontagne.
Other contributing authors include Patrick Reed, Ph.D., professor of Civil and Environmental Engineering at Cornell University; Giacomo Marangoni, Ph.D., post-doctoral researcher at the Department of Management, Economics and Industrial Engineering, at the Politecnico di Milano, Milan; Klaus Keller, Ph.D., professor of Geosciences at Pennsylvania State University; and Gregory Garner, Ph.D., post-doctoral researcher in Earth and Planetary Sciences at Rutgers University.
This work was partially supported by the National Science Foundation through the Network for Sustainable Climate Risk Management (SCRiM) under NSF cooperative agreement GEO 1240507 as well as the Penn State Center for Climate Risk Management.
Lamontagne, J.R, Reed, P.M., Marangoni, G., Keller, K. and Garner, G.G. “Robust abatement pathways to tolerable climate futures require immediate global action.”
Nature Climate Change: http://dx.